| PS. |
|
Posted by:
 |
rockfenris2005 10:33 am UTC 08/04/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Mr. Smeg is trying really hard (the poor dear) - rockfenris2005 10:19 am UTC 08/04/09 |
|
When the fuck did I say it was a discussion board? You're the one who's insane. The worst thing is that you're insanity is getting worse as can be seen on this forum in the past year.
>
> > You made no valid example whatsoever, just random
> > nonsense. My blog was for up to date news and the sharing
> > of goods, its never been a discussion board.
> >
> > You claim you're sane when clearly you're not. You daft
> > cunt.
>
> Use your brains. It's a valid example. Syd Barrett was
> still alive doing nothing with his career and plenty of
> people were talking about him instead of trashing other
> people on his forums. The comparison is there. I don't
> care what you say. To you I say:
>
> I'm sorry. You are wasting our time. Please stop this and
> discuss Jim Steinman's work.
>
> Fact: I am sane. I don't care what you say. To you I say:
>
> I'm sorry. You are wasting our time. Please stop this and
> discuss Jim Steinman's work.
>
> You resort to petty name-calling after people disagree
> with you for any extended period of time. Your behaviour
> in these instances is more twisted than the """lunatics"""
> who post here. You twist little things around into a
> complete and utter character assassination and if that
> person is not smart, there can be no vindication. To me,
> those types of people are the """lunatics""", not the ones
> they accuse. I'd feel more safe talking to these
> """lunatics" on a dark night in an alley than talking to
> people like you.
>
> Now go start a Steinman thread. Or perhaps you should play
> with your toys?
>
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Mr. Smeg is trying really hard (the poor dear) - rockfenris2005 10:19 am UTC 08/04/09 |
| Next: |
re: PS. - Pudding 12:53 am UTC 08/05/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|