| re: Not at all | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 01:57 pm UTC 09/15/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Not at all - Smeghead 12:01 pm UTC 09/15/09 |
| Do you have to pay royalties to Pudding for using his trademarked phrase? > comes from the Egg... > he's still a a daft cunt... and I wish he'd go away... but > I can't call for his banning, since apparently he was > telling the truth when he told us of all his close, inner > circle dealings with Jim. > > > On the other hand discussing dead people is better than no > > discussion at all. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Not at all - Smeghead 12:01 pm UTC 09/15/09 |
| Next: | re: Not at all - Pudding 11:46 pm UTC 09/15/09 |
| Thread: |
|