| re: Not at all |
|
Posted by:
 |
Smeghead 02:57 pm UTC 09/15/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Not at all - Vin 01:57 pm UTC 09/15/09 |
|
I'm not sure which of us first called him a daft cunt...
> Do you have to pay royalties to Pudding for using his
> trademarked phrase?
>
> > comes from the Egg...
> > he's still a a daft cunt... and I wish he'd go away... but
> > I can't call for his banning, since apparently he was
> > telling the truth when he told us of all his close, inner
> > circle dealings with Jim.
> >
> > > On the other hand discussing dead people is better than no
> > > discussion at all.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Not at all - Smeghead 06:11 pm UTC 09/18/09 |
| Next: |
re: Not at all - daveake 03:12 pm UTC 09/15/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|