| re: Hang Cool | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 01:55 pm UTC 04/22/10 |
| In reply to: | re: Hang Cool - CultOfByron 10:28 pm UTC 04/21/10 |
| Any chance you have a link to this interview? Sounds interesting. > Well compared to Bat III, which was so obviously 'comped' > (as he says in a recent interview) as to not sound human, > I think that HCTB is the result of him genuinely singing > better and Cavallo (or engineer) being better with the > software than Child (or engineer) BUT not having to use it > as a fix as much. > > I assume here that 'comped' means Protools or Autotune or > some variant of these... > > > I honestly have to wonder what was involved in getting > > Meat's vocals. I mean, they are certainly not 100% great > > throughout HCTB, there a few rough spots, but by and large > > they are very good, so much so that I wonder if they were > > extremely technologically doctored. One line in "Elvis in > > Vegas," - Meat sings "and then the lights went out," and > > his voice is high and pure as it was, I don't know, on Bat > > II or maybe even Bad Attitude. Is it real, or is it > > Auto-tune? (or whatever they use) I also like that Meat > > uses more of his lower register, which I've long-thought > > was under-utilized. > > > > > I hope and I think that Jim gets inspiration after > > > listening Hang Cool teddy bear, just like he wanted to > > > make Bat 2 after listening Blind before I stop, at least > > > he said that in an interview back in 1993. > > > > > > Hang Cool is really cool. Meat sounds focking great. Good > > > thing: no attempt to make it sound like Steinman. great, > > > great very great Album, I got my Meat back cause I lost > > > him somehow. Jim, get him back it is not too late > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Hang Cool - CultOfByron 10:28 pm UTC 04/21/10 |
| Next: | re: Hang Cool - CultOfByron 02:16 pm UTC 04/22/10 |
| Thread: |
|