HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: "TANZ" VS "BOOH"

Posted by:
steven_stuart 05:30 pm UTC 08/23/10
In reply to: re: "TANZ" VS "BOOH" - Rob 11:17 pm UTC 08/22/10

> Well, that all sounds very exciting but you know me - I
> always have more questions.

I like your questions. I prefer your attitude to the attitude of people who read and lurk without bothering to post.

> Are we to assume that the "creative problems and financial
> problems" you referred to a week ago have now been
> resolved?

Not all of them. Posters are comparing "BOOH" to "DOTV" but there were loads of people with artistic input when they put "DOTV" up (like Michael Crawford, for example). "BOOH" is a very unusual musical becuase it is being completely created by one genius. The producers, the director, the production designer, the choreographer and others have to do every thing they can to turn the wonderful vision of Obsidian into a reality. That is not easy. There will be creative and financial problems all the way up to opening night. ALW and Hal Prince were still working on creative problems when "Phantom" opened. ALW and Cameron Mackintosh almost went to jail because they still had finacial problems when "Cats" opened. The musical is unusual but financial and creative problems are not. There are certainly no creative problems that could wreck the show (a big difference from "DOTV").

> After all, if a venue has been identified and
> its availibility has been confirmed, there must be a
> fairly clear idea of when the opening night will be. Can
> you confirm a date? Or maybe a year?

Sorry. I have asked if I could write about that on the board and the answer was "no". Even Jim is gagged. That is why he never blogs these days. I look forward to all the gags being removed.

Can you understand the need for gagging orders? I sort of get it but I'm not entirely convinced that they are a good idea.

> It's also great to hear that Jim is so proud of the
> script. Presumably he has solved the thorny problem of
> where Bat Out of Hell should reside in the last week as
> well? Sounds like it's been a crackerjack week!

Could you explain "where Bat Out Of Hell" should reside? Sorry. I am thick but willing to learn.

> You say the show will cost a fortune (well, just the
> motorbikes actually!). Are we to assume that the financial
> backing is in place, given that venue is now booked?

The motorbikes are just one example of things that drive the cost up. I can't really talk about financial backing.
The new executive producer (who concentrates on finance) is dealing with that side of things. Don't worry.

> Lastly - for now - can I ask why the above information
> isn't being mailed out to the 3,000 poor souls who signed
> up to the official website? Seems a no-brainer to issue an
> update like this to those who registered an interest,
> seeing as it's all in the public domain now anyway.

I'm sure that the 3,0000 will eventually be fed. I just don't know when. I hope they are in the mood to forgive when it happens.

> Rob (hoping for the best!!)

Thanks Rob.


reply |

Previous: re: "TANZ" VS "BOOH" - Rob 11:17 pm UTC 08/22/10
Next: re: "TANZ" VS "BOOH" - Rob 11:25 pm UTC 08/23/10

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE