HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Far more interesting than the prospect of Meat doing Jim…

Posted by:
Klasien 01:38 pm UTC 02/24/11
In reply to: Far more interesting than the prospect of Meat doing Jim… - Wilbury 05:36 am UTC 02/23/11

mental images aside... (yes, a dirty mind is a joy forever, but this is way below dirty)

I like that idea, I do think some of Meat's songs could be made even stronger with a little help from Jim... but to then go back and revisit... dunno...

Maybe Meat should hope for another album like Neighbourhood...?
A few Jimsongs, a few songs from other writers but produced by Jim... and perhaps with a real context or storyline to them...

-K-
who is glad that these guys' career moves don't depend on her

> … is Jim doing Meat.
>
> Holy shit, what a mental image that is.
>
> I very much like Meat covering Jim songs, for the most
> part. Unlike most people, I really like his version of
> Left In The Dark. Most of the covers on Monster are all
> tripe, but up til then they were all good.
>
> But I've just had a thought that Jim remixing some of
> Meat's songs (like he did to Take That), would be waaaay
> more interesting. A number of Meat's songs are good
> without being great, but I think they could be GREAT given
> the right lovin'.
>
> Blind as a Bat and Testify could both be kicked up a notch
> from alrite to fantastic. Testify too. Maybe even
> something older, like Where Angels Sing.
>
> What do you reckon?
>
> **As an aside, I find Meat Loaf's comment that Desmond
> played 'song doctor' on Blind As A Bat completely
> laughable, given how broken the arrangement still is…


reply |

Previous: Far more interesting than the prospect of Meat doing Jim… - Wilbury 05:36 am UTC 02/23/11
Next: re: Far more interesting than the prospect of Meat doing Jim… - Wilbury 05:26 am UTC 02/25/11

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE