| re: Far more interesting than the prospect of Meat doing Jim… | |
|
Posted by: |
Klasien 01:38 pm UTC 02/24/11 |
| In reply to: | Far more interesting than the prospect of Meat doing Jim… - Wilbury 05:36 am UTC 02/23/11 |
| mental images aside... (yes, a dirty mind is a joy forever, but this is way below dirty) I like that idea, I do think some of Meat's songs could be made even stronger with a little help from Jim... but to then go back and revisit... dunno... Maybe Meat should hope for another album like Neighbourhood...? A few Jimsongs, a few songs from other writers but produced by Jim... and perhaps with a real context or storyline to them... -K- who is glad that these guys' career moves don't depend on her > … is Jim doing Meat. > > Holy shit, what a mental image that is. > > I very much like Meat covering Jim songs, for the most > part. Unlike most people, I really like his version of > Left In The Dark. Most of the covers on Monster are all > tripe, but up til then they were all good. > > But I've just had a thought that Jim remixing some of > Meat's songs (like he did to Take That), would be waaaay > more interesting. A number of Meat's songs are good > without being great, but I think they could be GREAT given > the right lovin'. > > Blind as a Bat and Testify could both be kicked up a notch > from alrite to fantastic. Testify too. Maybe even > something older, like Where Angels Sing. > > What do you reckon? > > **As an aside, I find Meat Loaf's comment that Desmond > played 'song doctor' on Blind As A Bat completely > laughable, given how broken the arrangement still is… | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Far more interesting than the prospect of Meat doing Jim… - Wilbury 05:36 am UTC 02/23/11 |
| Next: | re: Far more interesting than the prospect of Meat doing Jim… - Wilbury 05:26 am UTC 02/25/11 |
| Thread: |
|