| re: an apology to Jim - no reply required |
|
Posted by:
 |
LordRahl 01:23 am UTC 01/11/12 |
| In reply to: |
an apology to Jim - no reply required - Klasien 05:08 am UTC 01/10/12 |
|
huh?
> Dear Jim,
>
> I just wanted to take up 2 seconds of your time to
> apologize for the comment I posted yesterday in reply to
> Scaramouche's Batman post.
> I had no right and no reason for what was intended as a
> tongue-in-cheek comment that came out totally wrong.
>
> I should know better than to think I have the right to
> speak to you in that manner and really regretted making
> the comment from the moment I read it back and realised
> exactly what I had said and how it would be interpreted.
>
> I wish you nothing but the best, both personally and
> professionally, obviously for reasons both noble and
> selfish, and hope that the occasional ramblings from fans
> who consider you and (or perhaps through) your music to be
> among the most important influences and people in their
> lives do not stop you from 'staying in the trenches' with
> us.
>
> Sincerely,
> Klasien
>
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Infinite_Victims 06:43 pm UTC 01/11/12 |
| Next: |
re: an apology to Jim - no reply required - Klasien 04:35 am UTC 01/11/12 |
|
| Thread: |
|