not logged in
| Retort | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 12:29 am UTC 05/01/07 |
| In reply to: | This is golden - Pudding 12:01 am UTC 05/01/07 |
> Not only do you think Jim is Richard O'Brien, The reason why I have stated such is this: In 1974, before the film was released, Jimmy told me about it. He told me he wrote and starred in it, he described the character to me, and said it would be released in about a year. He had just finished the filming. In 1977, he contacted me once more, and made some reference to the film and asked me what I thought of it. Though he made no assertions on his own behalf at that time, he did thank me for my thoughts in the third person, which made me quizically wondering. Then, ten years later, he expounded upon it in large and compelling detail during the course of a small private dinner party. Afterwards, I studied what he had said, found in my own perceptions its appearance of truth, and have released my findings. nor was it > good enough that you believe you are married to him now > but you were also married to him in a past life. With patience and an open mind, you will find that much written in Jim's works allude to this and it is something, a part of that which we emotionally and spiritually draw strength from within our continuing bond. Often times people are curious about such things. If you are not one of those, that is personal to you. That > would be more than enough insanity for most people, Differences between life experiences are not definitions of insanity, neither are unique lives. What defines insanity is the involuntary unwillingness to be a social creature amongst others. What else defines insanity is actual illness. You don't have to agree, and you don't have to believe, but your difficulty does not make me insane. but in > the past couple of days you've managed to top yourself > (wishful thinking) and say you popped Jims cherry What, he popped his own? Someone had to. It was a major experience in my life and our lives. You are shocked that someone would say that they did? You are shocked that someone like that still can write the words to say that they did? What is so shocking? I think we all knew Jim isn't a virgin. and now > you're the descendant of Czar Nicholas II. Well, I was actually born this. What will it be > tomorrow, that you've invented time travel by using > ketchup, vinegar and a boiled egg? Do you think that I might invent something? Hmm. Maybe I'll invent an astrological method by which to rectify a birth chart to within a degree of accuracy, just by knowing someone's significant biography? > > I'm kinda agreeing what Smeg said earlier Smeg knows just the phrase "Ban Susan". I don't see anything of particular quality to that. Like I make the very air he breathes putrid? I don't think so. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: This is golden - MegaMilton 12:34 am UTC 05/01/07 |
| Next: | re: Retort - Pudding 12:44 am UTC 05/01/07 |
| Thread: |
|