| re: Bat vs BfG |
|
Posted by:
 |
Wilbury 06:01 am UTC 05/19/07 |
| In reply to: |
re: Bat vs BfG - rockfenris2005 05:57 am UTC 05/19/07 |
|
Yeccchhh, don't ge tme started on Pandora's Box's flaws... some editing would have done that puppy the world of good.
Conversely tho, I find Bat 2 to be pretty much perfect (It'd be my most heavily listened to jim music I'd say).
That's why it smarts so much that the remastered one (not the most recent that came with a DVD -- I haven't got that yet -- the one that came before it, the "deluxe edition" one with a bonus disc of edited versions) is completely fucked. They fucked with pretty much all the rhythm guitars from the beginning to end of the album, screwed up the indexing of the tracks between Everythign Louder and Good Girls AND clipped the last few second off the end of the Everything Louder bagpipes. Fuckers!! A little attention to detail would be grrreeeaaaat. Especially when they've got the nerve to call it deluxe.
Anyway - that's clearly off the topic, which is where does he get all those wonderful toys!?!
>
> >
> > Is this opinion shared by others here? or is Bat too
> > strong to pass?
>
> I love "Bad For Good" and "Original Sin" but they both
> have flaws. "Back Into Hell" has flaws too. To me, "Bat
> Out Of Hell" and "Tanz Der Vampire" are FLAWLESS
>
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Bat vs BfG - rockfenris2005 05:57 am UTC 05/19/07 |
| Next: |
re: Bat vs BfG - rockfenris2005 06:04 am UTC 05/19/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|