| re: Bat vs BfG |
|
Posted by:
 |
rockfenris2005 06:04 am UTC 05/19/07 |
| In reply to: |
re: Bat vs BfG - Wilbury 06:01 am UTC 05/19/07 |
|
> Yeccchhh, don't ge tme started on Pandora's Box's flaws...
> some editing would have done that puppy the world of
> good.
>
> Conversely tho, I find Bat 2 to be pretty much perfect
> (It'd be my most heavily listened to jim music I'd say).
>
> That's why it smarts so much that the remastered one (not
> the most recent that came with a DVD -- I haven't got that
> yet -- the one that came before it, the "deluxe edition"
> one with a bonus disc of edited versions) is completely
> fucked. They fucked with pretty much all the rhythm
> guitars from the beginning to end of the album, screwed up
> the indexing of the tracks between Everythign Louder and
> Good Girls AND clipped the last few second off the end of
> the Everything Louder bagpipes. Fuckers!! A little
> attention to detail would be grrreeeaaaat. Especially when
> they've got the nerve to call it deluxe.
>
> Anyway - that's clearly off the topic, which is where does
> he get all those wonderful toys!?!
>
I like "Back Into Hell" but there are too many recycles. I could live without Meat's version of "Good Girls". I'd love if "Seize The Night" had been written by that stage as that would have made a better track. With that said, I find it near impossible to imagine BAT2 in a different order with different songs
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Bat vs BfG - Wilbury 06:01 am UTC 05/19/07 |
| Next: |
re: Bat vs BfG - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 01:23 pm UTC 09/16/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|