> It wouldn't be a problem at all, if the show was a tribute
> to Meat.
>
> -- Which is most certainly is NOT.
>
> But that is how it would be taken if he wasn't there as
> one of the cast, doing his bit. I'm willing to bet it'd be
> the one thing all the critics say, that its "not Meat"
> performing the Meat song, if you were try and record bat
> with anyone else. But hey, I'm sure Jim's on top of it.
> :o)
>
Yeah, it's complicated. You could almost use the "Psycho" argument where Gus Van Sant remade Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho"? Does anyone remember that? I think they may be slightly curious about it but it's Hitchcock's version that's remember. In this case, it's going to be an enormous challenge for Jim. But, really, all he has to communicate is that this is "Neverland", a project he started before he even met Meat, and doesn't have anything to do with him except for the fact he made a few of its songs famous. Although Meat should still have a part in it, like host of the DVD or something. I dunno.
|
