Copyright issues are 1) definable on the internet searches without speaking with attorneys 2)subject to various usage clauses such as fair use which do not require explicit consent 3)attorneys charge upwards of 300 dollars per hour, which gets billed to the client for every moment spent talking about that client with anyone at all. To get the most of copyright issues, get your own attorney to consult and pay him the 300 dollars per hour you are bringing to the other persons' expending. If you consult with him about copyright issues of your own works, are you saying that you are a client of his?
>
> I know this looks bad
>
> > if this is such a meaningless thing in your life then why
> > do you spend so much time getting it your way??
>
> It isn't meaningless. I didn't mean it that way. I'm just
> saying, if you look at the bigger picture there are a lot
> more important things than arguing with someone on a
> message-forum.
> >
> > You go over Jim's and JD's head because they don't treat
> > the place the way you want them to
>
> Wait, wait, wait. This doesn't have anything to do with
> what I want. It may look like that but from where I'm
> standing, it isn't.
>
> and then claim you are
> > 1) only trying to help
>
> Yes, I was.
>
> > 2) not really that interested in this place anyway
>
> But I am interested. I'm just saying this whole schmozzle
> is not that important in the scheme of things.
> >
> > Who the fuck do you think you are??
> >
>
> The pope (who is an ex-Nazi).
>
> > K.
> > for who this board is massively important in a non-sick
> > kind of way ;-)
> >
>
> Yes, I know it might look like that. It's not like I just
> randomly called him out of the blue for the first time. I
> have spoken to him in the past about copyright issues that
> I wouldn't have discussed at all unless it was urgent.
>
>
|
