not logged in
| re: Ryan get your ehad out of your arse | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 09:17 pm UTC 05/19/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Ryan get your ehad out of your arse - pidunk 01:34 pm UTC 05/19/07 |
> > Copyright issues are 1) definable on the internet searches > without speaking with attorneys 2)subject to various usage > clauses such as fair use which do not require explicit > consent 3)attorneys charge upwards of 300 dollars per > hour, which gets billed to the client for every moment > spent talking about that client with anyone at all. To get > the most of copyright issues, get your own attorney to > consult and pay him the 300 dollars per hour you are > bringing to the other persons' expending. If you consult > with him about copyright issues of your own works, are you > saying that you are a client of his? A Question asked is a question waiting for answer. What copyright issues did you contact Siegel about that were "urgent"? I'm trying to figure this out. You are in Australia, presumably doing your productions in Australia, presumably knowing how to handle your copyrights, and you are calling a New York United States attorney about "urgent" copyright issues......so, are you his client? If you are not his client, what about your website brings about any "urgent" copyright issues? The website is not serving as your livelihood, I fail to see urgency in questions arising of your need to learn about copyrights, and, most people do not seek out attorneys for that....it is a widely available set of resources...see Stanford University, for example, or others. If someone needs more than these basic copyright information resources, they are not usually operating fan sites. So, it is a question begging for an answer that makes sense of your answer about contacts you have had with Siegel about "copyright issues". > > > > > > > > I know this looks bad > > > > > if this is such a meaningless thing in your life then why > > > do you spend so much time getting it your way?? > > > > It isn't meaningless. I didn't mean it that way. I'm just > > saying, if you look at the bigger picture there are a lot > > more important things than arguing with someone on a > > message-forum. > > > > > > You go over Jim's and JD's head because they don't treat > > > the place the way you want them to > > > > Wait, wait, wait. This doesn't have anything to do with > > what I want. It may look like that but from where I'm > > standing, it isn't. > > > > and then claim you are > > > 1) only trying to help > > > > Yes, I was. > > > > > 2) not really that interested in this place anyway > > > > But I am interested. I'm just saying this whole schmozzle > > is not that important in the scheme of things. > > > > > > Who the fuck do you think you are?? > > > > > > > The pope (who is an ex-Nazi). > > > > > K. > > > for who this board is massively important in a non-sick > > > kind of way ;-) > > > > > > > Yes, I know it might look like that. It's not like I just > > randomly called him out of the blue for the first time. I > > have spoken to him in the past about copyright issues that > > I wouldn't have discussed at all unless it was urgent. > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Ryan get your ehad out of your arse - pidunk 01:34 pm UTC 05/19/07 |
| Next: | fine, if you want to ruin your board - rockfenris2005 07:32 am UTC 05/19/07 |
| Thread: | |