HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Schrödinger's cat

Posted by:
Steven 11:10 am UTC 08/23/10
In reply to: re: Some official clarifaction(and getting a rant of my chest) - AndrewG 09:56 am UTC 08/23/10

> This is a board dedicated to Jim Steinman and not Steven
> Stuart. His opinion or posts are no more valid than anyone
> else's.

Exactly my point!

> I'm not going to befriend/believe him JUST because
> his mother is involved in the project and the latter I do
> think is ass kissing.

Agree completely.

I for one don't believe or disbelieve, I just read.
To me, this is all a bit like Schrödinger's cat. -- The things being said on this board can be true and untrue at the same time until the box is opened, i.e. until we see results.
Until then, I consider the things I read here as true as I consider them as untrue. In the end, only the results count. The question is how long we can wait for the results without completely losing interest.





reply |

Previous: re: Some official clarifaction(and getting a rant of my chest) - steven_stuart 07:21 pm UTC 08/23/10
Next: re: Schrödinger's cat - steven_stuart 07:26 pm UTC 08/23/10

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE