| re: Schrödinger's cat | |
|
Posted by: |
steven_stuart 07:26 pm UTC 08/23/10 |
| In reply to: | re: Schrödinger's cat - Steven 11:10 am UTC 08/23/10 |
| > I for one don't believe or disbelieve, I just read. > To me, this is all a bit like Schrödinger's cat. -- The > things being said on this board can be true and untrue at > the same time until the box is opened, i.e. until we see > results. > Until then, I consider the things I read here as true as I > consider them as untrue. In the end, only the results > count. The question is how long we can wait for the > results without completely losing interest. Brilliant. Well said. I doubt that I would have brought up the musical if Rob hadn't been interested. I think I was busy talking about the fjords in Norway. But what does AndrewG think I should have done? Just ignore Rob? That dude needs to give peace a chance. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Schrödinger's cat - Steven 11:10 am UTC 08/23/10 |
| Next: | re: Schrödinger's cat - AndrewG 07:18 pm UTC 08/23/10 |
| Thread: | |