HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Schrödinger's cat

Posted by:
AndrewG 07:18 pm UTC 08/23/10
In reply to: re: Schrödinger's cat - Steven 11:10 am UTC 08/23/10

> I for one don't believe or disbelieve, I just read.
> To me, this is all a bit like Schrödinger's cat. -- The
> things being said on this board can be true and untrue at
> the same time until the box is opened, i.e. until we see
> results.
> Until then, I consider the things I read here as true as I
> consider them as untrue. In the end, only the results
> count. The question is how long we can wait for the
> results without completely losing interest.

Yes that's a very good point. I just hope Jim isn't putting all his eggs in one basket and then it might fail. Would have like to have seen him work with Meat again before it's too late.


reply |

Previous: re: Schrödinger's cat - steven_stuart 07:26 pm UTC 08/23/10
Next: "TANZ" VS "BOOH" - steven_stuart 12:02 am UTC 08/22/10

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE