Can someone place this into context of an actual project, an actual agreement, or an actual conversation said to have been had with Jim? Or is this Meat saying his opinion?
Am I incorrect in remembering that the BAT3 project involved the same desire by Meat for Jim's involvement and Jim said No? How would this be any different than that?
Anyone can tell their wishful thoughts, even those conveyed to their attorneys, in an interview. It's not the most desired PR, but there's no prohibition against it IMHO.
>
>
> > Can anybody tell me what he is saying cause I have no
> > speakers at work. Thanx.
> >
>
> "... I was speaking to my lawyer... right before I got on
> the plane to come here, and I said, look, we're gonna do
> this other piece and... and I said Jimmy's gotta...
> Jimmy's gotta be the one to produce this and I said, I
> know people are gonna argue with me and... but I said, no,
> reality is Jim's gotta do this and so... If we're gonna do
> it's gotta be Jim."
>
> So that's a yes, then?
>
> "Ya."
>
> Hooray!
>
>
> It's right toward the end.
>
>
|
