HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Hello...hello....hello....(simulated echo sound)

Posted by:
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 12:42 am UTC 07/01/07
In reply to: re: Hello...hello....hello....(simulated echo sound) - pidunk 09:56 pm UTC 06/30/07

Well, I'm still confused on the Jim Cypherd thing, but I can live with that. I'm also really confused that 'gallytrotter' popped up on your website the very same day I accessed it--but I wasn't on for more than 30 mins max, so that is weird. Gallytrot is very unusual and to have any affiliation with a 'Leesa' I would even admit that was more than a coincidence. But I've never been big into conspiracy theories--I don't do anything interesting enough for people to want to impersonate me! I do do alot of searches on peoples' names and I know that 'gallytrot' isn't really out there. I still think it was my cyber-print (or whatever I leave!) hanging around your webpage--I really do. My stupid computer maybe just didn't disconnect or something--broadband can be weird, so please don't worry about 2 entities--the Yahoo! search is too much of a coincidence.
I definately do not know a Thaya--'Leesa' is on my birth certificate as my folks in northern Iowa all those years ago were surrounded by people who couldn't pronounce 'Lisa', so they had to be phonetically correct! So I still am really curious about 2 points you brought up. The first is who this 'Leesa' is who founded the RH cult--was she someone you had correspondence with? The second is who DID you phone in December 1980? Am I wrong or is that THE person you had me confused with? I mean if so, this is a no brainer--whoever you called, that's your girl--what was her name and where did she live? Surely you have some recollection as to who that was. That would be a good place to start retracing. It could be that after 27 years the person isn't even alive anymore--that's a huge timespan--longer than most of the Rockman folk here have even been alive...
Anyway, don't worry too much about 2 gallytrotters--I'm sure it's my print somehow stuck there. But do let me know what you recall about that person you phoned.
By the way, I never found any photos of Mr Cypherd--I do think you've cornered the 'Jim Cypherd' net sites, by the way--everyone I hit I think was yours! He should pay you commission!
Leesa

>
>
> > I did go to your site the 24 June because I had no idea
> > who Jim Cypherd was. I left the Rockman page window open
> > so I could spell 'Cypherd' correctly. I couldn't access my
> > usual Google search without closing the Rockman page out,
> > so I did a Yahoo! search at the top of my screen. Your
> > site I believe was listed a number of times and I was just
> > bopping around to find out who this guy was. I'm not sure
> > what point you're trying to make about where the server
> > thing which Yahoo! apparently uses originates--are you
> > implying that I flew to San Jose to use a computer to
> > access your site, I guess to what--cover my tracks? Yet I
> > use THE SAME E-MAIL/KEYWORD on the search?? Then the next
> > day I fly back to Iowa to access another computer near
> > Cedar Rapids? I was on your site, yeah--I used my computer
> > in Iowa both times, yeah--the search engines were
> > different. What is the deal? I'm not trying to hide the
> > fact I was there trying to figure out who Anton Fig and
> > Jim Cypherd were--gallytrot/gallytrotter is my kennel name
> > and it's all over the web. I'm not hiding or concealing
> > anything. This cloak and dagger intrigue of yours really
> > is kinda stupid..
> > You waste my time and yours obsessing about stupid stuff
> > like where Yahoo! routes its internal searches from, yet
> > you refuse to answer the questions that I ask about who
> > you called December 1980. You were the one who started
> > that conversation by claiming you called me that night,
> > yet when pressed as to a name and location, YOU'RE the one
> > running off and avoiding a pointblank question you know
> > damned well you can't answer.
> > Looks like you've been caught in yet another long reaching
> > whopper.
> > Leesa
> > >
>
> I'm caught in nothing, but you like stressing there is
> something wrong with what I do. You do not know Cypherd's
> temperment. First of all, if the concept had not been
> introduced to me by him, which then I used as basis for
> reminding him that I think he said it was okay, after
> which he indicated there was no problem, I could not feel
> confident in maintaining my line of study and publishing.
> Cypherd, upon having an objection would make sure I knew
> well that he had an objection by letting me know in sharp
> and interpersonal terms such as we know between us, and
> you know what, he hasn't. Steinman, meanwhile, and he,
> have the identical blurb on identical blogs saying in fun
> the identical things about not knowing Susan...same words
> a joke....and Steinman placed that statement only after
> some people made specific requests that he do so.....and
> it does not really matter, because Steinman if he had a
> problem would have said something like was said about
> Milton a long time ago on his blog. He is creative enough,
> isn't he, to make something very creative as a statement,
> but he didn't. So, when the requests came and I said he
> might give out the granting of the requests saying it
> would not mean anything ahead of time, out on the limb
> came that, and it worked out really well actually by
> giving me some time to focus on some things I needed to.
> But in the last analysis it was proven more appropriate
> for me to be here than not, and Cypherd and Steinman both
> are in their silent support of it. Of course I don't know
> Steinman, and I know Cypherd a long time. You want to know
> who Cypherd is, he is a brilliant amazing creative
> wordsmith who talks anyone under a table with the
> slightest of aplomb, moves fast, talks fast, talks in a
> myriad of punctuating accents and foriegn cliches, has a
> sense of humor and a really good feel for what another
> person is thinking and feeling. He is like a well of
> experience and is someone to listen to. Cypherd is the one
> who is behind these songs you love so much, words and
> music, while Steinman is behind the ideas for the themes
> of the songs and some of the artistic imagery of visual
> productions. Cypherd's the beat and the orchestra, and
> Steinman's the bats. Cypherd's the vampires and Steinman's
> the frankenstein. They are close as cousins, and as
> vocations are concerned, Cypherd is all into music, while
> Steinman puts himself towards Cypherd's works in show and
> support of them, and according to one appearance he made,
> he likes to do carpentry work with a lathe. I am close
> with Cypherd as much as our circumstances have permitted,
> and I am feeling warm feelings towards Steinman who I knew
> briefly as a caring and committed friend and family member
> as a child, when I became first engaged to Cypherd at that
> time. My involvement with Cypherd predates this by as many
> years as I've been here, with my first memory of him when
> I was around nine months of age. I met Steinman once when
> I was six years old and Cypherd arranged for the two of us
> to meet. There's alot that I have not written about who
> Cypherd is, but I have written about what Cypherd has
> done. Cypherd is a musician, songwriter, actor, vocalist,
> vocal coach, producer, among other things.
>
> As for your interest in the name Leesa, like I said, and
> your interests may be best served in the long run along
> with Cypherd's and my own as well as Steinman's if you
> just sit back and realize that, if you are not the Leesa
> being written of, there is a Leesa who is. If you did not
> make a yahoo search from a physical San Jose location the
> day before you were taken with curiosity of who Cypherd
> is, someone did, using the keyword "gallytrotter". What I
> mean by this is that someone typed the word "gallytrotter"
> into the yahoo search field and saw what results came up
> for that. It has nothing to do with where your
> "gallytrotter" is shown, but it has everything with
> someone wanting specifically to see only that. The other
> Leesa does name searches all of the time, and she does go
> from place to place. If the other Leesa is looking at
> where "gallytrotter" is, and she is in San Jose, and
> coincidentally the next day you decided to spend twenty
> one hours looking up who Jim Cypherd is, (or that was how
> long the site was connected to your computer) then go with
> the flow. I'll say that, somehow something went awry. You
> can find the other Leesa easily, just look it up. She does
> alot of home schooling stuff based in Arizona. She and I
> had a correspondence in which she denied being you, and
> showed me all sorts of things that was not able to prove
> about or not of being you, but did do proof of showing me
> that she was the person who I am concerned with, whose
> name originally was and is for her amusement, Thaya. Now
> would it not be interesting if Thaya decided to show her
> name around these places. She'd get the reception that I
> gave to you. If we make the most directly amiable
> agreement on this, let's stick with this: Thaya deserves
> the reception that I gave to you, Thaya turned herself for
> part or full time purposes into someone named Leesa, and
> is found on the net because you are on this site also
> called Leesa. Then she emails me says she isn't you, and
> you and she seem to agree on that. But she is Thaya if you
> are not. Okay? So, the name Leesa has to stay, but I will
> need to do more research about gallytrotter before I take
> the email address off of my site. Then once I do, you
> won't be confused anymore about who I mean.
>
> Please consider that you have brought this well enough to
> my attention that I will seriously look into correcting
> the article for your benefit. However, in order to do so I
> must complete some more research. It won't take long.
> Please give about twenty days before I am certain of the
> action, and I will keep you apprised. Twenty days most.
>
> Not being snide gets people communicating. What is wrong
> with people communicating? Cypherd wrote Rocky Horror. I
> am glad you like it, but it does have much more in it than
> the audience bally-hoos let you know. I adore the film and
> the music. One day I hope to see the script of the stage
> musical.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >
> > > You accessed the site 6/24/07 and a yahoo search made from
> > > San Jose, California using a Linux O/S was made using the
> > > keyword "gallytrotter" and accessed the page on the
> > > website where some of the particulars you seek below are
> > > to be found, as well as several other pages on the
> > > website. This search was conducted through yahoo a total
> > > of three times with links between the site being accessed
> > > from these yahoo search accesses. Then, there were no
> > > other yahoo search accesses, or any other entries from
> > > either San Jose, or that IP. But, on the next day, you
> > > decided to go gung ho on the site with 30 accesses,
> > > originating from the keyword of "Jim Cypherd". You say
> > > what you say but it smells like you don't need to ask the
> > > questions you ask. Now you have these statements and
> > > questions when you were satisfied with being flippant and
> > > hostile before, and I have been nothing but serious and
> > > truthful with everyone on the board. I am not attacking
> > > but being attacked, and it is looking all too strategic to
> > > me. I can call someone and ask them why they put green
> > > cheese in the moon and tell you what they say, would that
> > > clarify information about the moon for you?
> > >
> > >


reply |

Previous: re: Hello...hello....hello....(simulated echo sound) - pidunk 09:56 pm UTC 06/30/07
Next: re: Hello...hello....hello....(simulated echo sound) - pidunk 05:30 am UTC 07/01/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE