| re: Bat musical on hold? |
|
Posted by:
 |
LordRahl 12:04 am UTC 03/29/13 |
| In reply to: |
re: Bat musical on hold? - steven_stuart 11:40 pm UTC 03/27/13 |
|
> > It was announced how long ago?? I'd say "on hold" is
> > self-evident. As for Jim's lack of motivation... who knows
> > (that would tell)?
>
> They have been trying to get it off the ground for years
> but you might be surprised in the near future. There are
> other shows which have taken longer and they eventually
> became hits. I can't tell you which ones at the moment. I
> would have to ask an expert like Ryan. But I am pretty
> sure that some took as long as ten years.
I may be in the minority here, but I would rather just have a conceptual album than the musical at this point. For one it guarantee we can all hear his new stuff, and for two it is probably a lot easier to create.
Ive said it before that I think Jim goes overboard with crazy visuals and spectacle (which is strange I would say that considering Im such a big wrestling fan). For me Jim at the piano with a single voice singing his words is all it takes for me to drift off to my happy place.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Bat musical on hold? - steven_stuart 11:40 pm UTC 03/27/13 |
| Next: |
Concept Albums: Evita, Don Claude And BOOH - steven_stuart 02:50 am UTC 03/29/13 |
|
| Thread: |
|