| re: Some official clarifaction(and getting a rant of my chest) | |
|
Posted by: |
Steven 09:29 am UTC 08/23/10 |
| In reply to: | re: Some official clarifaction(and getting a rant of my chest) - AndrewG 06:35 am UTC 08/23/10 |
| > How is this off topic or this discussion old? Have you > even read this first post in this thread? Certainly. But have you? Let me summarize: The_wolf_with_the_red_roses: I'm so longing for an official update on the musical. Some say Jim is spent, I don't. I have faith in Jim and what he does, but it sucks that we don't get any official updates and I believe he owes to his fans. So anyone from the Jim-camp: Please respond! AndrewG: steven_stuart always acts like a troll and because of him Smeghead and Pudding got banned. steven_stuart doesn't get banned only for the reason that he is related to a person involved with Jim's musical. > being the only person who posts these > musical updates thus there is clearly some questioning > going on there as to why that is. That's clearly a question you should ask Jim. > My understanding is that > SS is posting such updates for exactly the reasons I > specified, out of his own interest. "Your understanding", exactly. Maybe you are right and steven_stuart posts such updates for the reasons you believe. Maybe you are wrong. 1) In case you are right, the best thing to do would be not to read any of steven_stuart's posts and just wait for the next official update. 2) In case you are wrong, the best thing to do would be to take whatever steven_stuart says with a grain of salt and to try to read between the lines while you are waiting for the next official update. > Thus he is still > continuing with his "behaviour". There's nothing "past" > about it. "His behaviour"™ would be the exuberant and annoying way of replying to posts (often starting new unnecessary threads to do so) like yours, in which he keeps on discussing and trying to justify what he or someone else has or has not said a thousand posts ago, whether he is a troll or not and why or why not he should or should not be banned etc. pp. Luckily, there have been no such arguments lately (amongst the reasons being the lack of accusations being posted, his absence from the board, the generally rather low traffic on the board), thus it is past. I hope it stays that way. The best way to prevent those boring endless discussions would be to not dig out those old "he's a troll, why does he post at all, bring back Smeghead and Pudding, we cannot believe him, he did this and that x months ago etc." arguments again. > that does not mean I should kiss his ass and > pretend to be his friend. If you choose to do that then > that's your own decision. So having an own opinion, which happens to be different from your views, automatically means one is pretending to be someone else's friend and an ass-kisser, I see. Or are you just trying to provoke another user "into a desired emotional response" here? Over and out. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Some official clarifaction(and getting a rant of my chest) - AndrewG 07:19 pm UTC 08/23/10 |
| Next: | re: Some official clarifaction(and getting a rant of my chest) - AndrewG 09:56 am UTC 08/23/10 |
| Thread: |
|