not logged in
| Bat vs BfG | |
Posted by:  |
Wilbury 05:50 am UTC 05/19/07 |
| Hey all. I don't mean to do the poll thing, and ask lame questions just to incite lame discussion, but here's a real quick (lame) question that I'm legitimately interested to hear the answers of: Does anyone here significantly prefer Bat over BfG, or vice versa? It's just hit me, going thru and cleaning up my albums / books etc, that I find Bad For Good waaayyyyy more interesting than Bat out of Hell. Be it thru over exposure of Bat or not I dunno, but Bad For Good is more interesting to me in pretty much every way: tracklist, album cover, free EP :o) , orchestral pieces, deeper pool of musicians, sonic quality in general. I don't like Karla DeVito from the live recordings all that much, but she's great on Dance in my Pants. And it's good to have the variation. Is this opinion shared by others here? or is Bat too strong to pass? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Eclipsing Guilty Pleasures - daveake 11:16 am UTC 05/19/07 |
| Next: | re: Bat vs BfG - Jaycee 12:01 am UTC 05/21/07 |
| Thread: |
|